The defendant's KRW 57,610 to the plaintiff is 5% per annum from May 26, 2017 to October 6, 2020, and the following.

On May 26, 2017, around 16:45, the liability for damages was established, there was a collision between the rear part of the Defendant Track and the front part of the Plaintiff Track in front of the Plaintiff Track (hereinafter “Plaintiff Track”) who was driving by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Track”) and the rear part of the Plaintiff Track, who was driving from the village to the village of D village according to the straight-line road in which the Defendant was going to enter the straight-line road.

(A) Evidence Nos. 1, B Nos. 1 and 2, and hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as salt pans, etc. in need of two weeks’ medical treatment.

(A) Therefore, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act or illegal acts.

On the other hand, the location of the accident in this case is an intersection without traffic control, and the width of the road in which the plaintiff's cargo is driving is wider than that of the road in which the plaintiff's cargo is driving and generally is obliged to yield to the vehicle in which the width is narrow (No. 1, No. 5, and Article 26 (2) of the Road Traffic Act), and the approach to the intersection is a very dangerous driving method as it is difficult to grasp the situation of the intersection properly, and on the other hand, it seems that the defendant Track was trying to enter the intersection to a certain extent, and thus, the accident occurred while most of the body of the vehicle in the intersection. However, considering the fact that the defendant Track appears to have entered the intersection, it seems reasonable to limit the defendant's responsibility to 70% in full view of the fact that the defendant Track appears to have first entered the intersection (Article 26 (1) of the Road Traffic Act).

The scope of damage compensation liability is lost income, and future treatment expenses are incurred by the Plaintiff due to the following aftermath of patriarche, malute disorder, low efficiency, and reduction of dental life for the Plaintiff due to the instant accident, and the labor disability ratio is 2.