Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 22, 2016, around 14:20 on 14:20, the Defendant discovered the victim E (at the age of 21) in the Da 3 reading room located in the Manan-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-si, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by rhyming the victim by putting the victim’s position in the seat corresponding to the victim and cutting off the buck.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of the witness F;
1. The defendant asserts that on-site photographs [one knee and knenee only limited to only part of the victim's knee and knee, and that he did not commit an indecent act such as the statement of facts
In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence mentioned above, it can be sufficiently recognized that there was an indecent act recorded in the facts constituting the crime.
(1) The victim was able to feel that the Defendant was able to use and rhumbuckbucks and bridges with him/her out of the investigative agency up to this court.
statement is made.
② The victim was set at a distance of 20 minutes from the inundation of the mobile phone, and it is presumed that the victim was in the state of the water surface because he memorys clearly that the inundation takes two times from the earphones.
Because the bucks in contact with the bucks are somewhat different from the kneeing knee, it seems not easy to perceive it.
Rather, according to the Defendant’s statement in the investigation agency, the Defendant was in a position that was unable to continue to present the part of the victim’s bridge due to the fact that the Defendant was missing only at the time, and the responsibility and partitions of the victim.
It seems that there is more possibility that the defendant could not know the contact point properly.
③ 피해자는 잠에서 깼을 때 피고인의 양 발이 피해자의 발목에서 똬리를 튼 모습처럼 겹쳐 있었다고
Specifically, the statements are made.
④ According to the images of on-site photographs, the gap between books is not wide, and the defendant is extending out.