1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff sought for the revocation of the non-approval of the additional medical care and the non-approval of the additional medical care. The first instance court dismissed the part of the claim for revocation of the non-approval of the additional medical care, and accepted the part of the claim for revocation of the non-approval of the additional medical care.

Therefore, since only the defendant appealed against the part of the claim for revocation of the additional injury and disease approval, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the above part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The grounds alleged by the defendant in the trial while filing an appeal by the court of first instance are not different from those alleged by the defendant in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are re-examineed along with the defendant's assertion, the judgment of the court of first instance that partially

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court regarding this case is that the reasoning for the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the corresponding part of the judgment, except for the dismissal as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420

The results of the request for the examination of the medical records to the Chief of the Seoul National University Hospital in the first instance court shall be as follows: "The results of the request for the examination of the medical records to the Chief of the Seoul National University Hospital in the first instance court and the results of the request for the examination of the Chief of the E Hospital in this court".

The examination of the Seoul National University Hospital affiliated with the Seoul National University Hospital, which was entrusted with the examination of medical records by this court, of 20 to 5 pages 1, are as follows: "The injury and disease of this case, which, upon receipt of a request for the examination of medical records from this court, has presented the results of the evaluation that it is related to the above brain-dead sugar and the Mali-gun after the

On the ground that “The head of the Gu, after May 2014, to which the F Hospital belongs, has been diagnosed as the injury to the disease of this case (the dementia and the chronic disorder after the head of the Gu) on the ground that “the level of recognition function to significantly impede the daily life of the Plaintiff, and the symptoms and symptoms beyond the self-regulation is continuing.”