logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.11 2014가합44845
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Under each of the following facts, facts may be acknowledged by integrating each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5 as a whole.

From Sep. 1, 1950 during the Korean War 6/25, the police officers of the Yangyang Police Station belonging to the defendant in the area of ASEAN-gun (former ASEAN-si) and the police officers of the Korea Youth Group in receipt of instructions from the police officers of the North Korean military at the time of the occupation and use of the North Korean armed forces, or the residents of the region without legitimate procedures due to the reasons that they are their family members, were killed collectively in the military inside the area of the same Gun (hereinafter referred to as the “sacrific case of the ASEAN-gun-si”), as prescribed in paragraphs (2) through (7) of the same paragraph, as the case of sacrifice of the ASEAN-gun-si, North Korean War 1950 during the 6/25 War (hereinafter referred to as the “sacrific case of the ASEAN-si”).

2) Around October 3, 1950, F, G, and H were detained in a bend and bend of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a hoe of a la

B. The former History Settlement Commission established pursuant to the Framework Act on the Settlement of History for the Truth and Reconciliation of the Decision of the former History Settlement Commission for the Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter “former History Settlement Commission”) conducted a truth-finding investigation on May 11, 2009 by investigating the case of sacrifice of the charge of the ASEAN, and confirmed the F and H (hereinafter “victims”) as victims.

C. The status of the parties is that Plaintiff A is H’s assistance car, Plaintiff B is F’s ancillary, Plaintiff C is F’s scam, and Plaintiff D is F’s ancillary.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts of recognition as to whether a public official belonging to the defendant constitutes the act of performing his duties, the police officers, who are public officials belonging to the defendant, murdering the victims of this case without due process, through acts having the appearance of performing their duties with the Korea Youth Organization, etc., and thereby mental health of the victims and their bereaved family members.

arrow