A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 14, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) in the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court for the same

7.11. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On March 5, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) stated that “500 meters of indictments are written from the front side of the third apartment of the third apartment of the third class in the Sinsi-si, Sinsi-si, to the front side of the third class apartment in the same Dong,” but it does not seem to have a substantial impediment to the Defendant’s exercise of the right to defense even if it is obvious that it is a clerical error and without any changes in the indictment, and even if it is corrected without any changes in the indictment, it is corrected ex

In the section of this section, Cchip car which is not covered by mandatory insurance without a driver's license has been driving.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle for a franchise.

On March 5, 2015, the Defendant had a duty of care to maintain the safety distance with the vehicle running in the same direction, and to accurately operate the steering gear, brakes and other devices, because the Defendant had the front apartment way of the Jinakdong, which is located in the Sinsi-si, Sinsi-si around 06:0, along the two-lanes from the area of the Sinsi-si, the Sinsi-si, which is located in the area of the Sinsi-si, the Defendant had the duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected his/her duty without a driver's license and operated a mobile phone without his/her driver's license and proceeded ahead of it in the same direction as that of the Defendant's vehicle by negligence, which led to the Defendant's failure in driving the mobile phone, and led the victim D (Nam and 43 years old) who was in the atmosphere of his/her traffic, and the part behind the 5 tons of the Erano-5 tons cargo vehicle was shocked with the front part of the said vehicle

Ultimately, the Defendant is a victim D and victimized vehicle through occupational negligence as above.