1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 68,200,00 and KRW 18,700,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 27,50,000.

1. On June 2012, 200,000 won for the design of the facilities in B district B as the result of the subcontract price service on the subcontract date, which was the result of the determination of the cause of the claim, and the design of the facilities in C district (hereinafter “C district”) and basic design on the date of June 2, 2012, KRW 27.5 million for D district A facilities and basic design on July 2, 2012, the sum of KRW 68.2 million on March 2, 2013, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant from around 2012, and delivered the result of the service on the basis of the subcontract price to the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 68.2 million for each of 201,000,0000,000 from the day following the subcontract price on which the Plaintiff received the subcontract price to the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 68.2,01,000,000,000 for each of the three services as indicated below.

2. The judgment of the Defendant’s assertion: (a) the design service for the entire construction works to the architect; (b) the architect provides the Defendant with the main civil engineering design service; (c) the Defendant again gives the Plaintiff with a successive contract or subcontract for the main facilities or the basic design service; and accordingly, (d) the Plaintiff submitted the service result to the architect in sequence; and (e) the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff the cost for the basic design service only when the architect submitted the service result to the ordering person and the service cost is paid by the ordering person. In the case of the three services listed in paragraph (1), the service cost is not adopted by LH Corporation, the ordering person, and thus the service cost is still paid.