Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On May 24, 2011, the Plaintiff assaulted the victim C on May 24, 201 in the Seoul Northern District Court Decision 201DaMa462, “On November 24, 2010, the first floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 924 early 24, the first floor of the apartment building, which was located in the Defendant’s corridor, when the victim’s face and body are tight with the victim C and Si expenses in relation to the jointboard set on the Defendant’s corridor, and when the victim’s face, shoulder, and arms were drinking, at the same place at around 18:00 on the same day, at the same time, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a fine of KRW 701,61, which became final and conclusive.”
B. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendants on the grounds that the Defendants were perjury in the above criminal case, but on August 22, 2011, the Plaintiff rendered a final judgment of the Defendants, which was not suspected of having been subject to suspicion (Evidence of Evidence).
C. On June 10, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a new complaint for perjury with Defendant B, but was dismissed on July 28, 2014.
On May 28, 2014, the Defendants, non-party D, E, and F filed a provisional injunction against the Plaintiff on May 28, 2014, and on September 15, 2014, “A debtor is prohibited from approaching the obligees against the obligees’ will, from telephoneing to the obligees, from visiting the obligees’ respective dwellings, and from visiting the obligees’ respective dwellings. A decision of provisional injunction against access to the religious events of the special church located in the first apartment building in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City 924 Seocho-dong 924, with a view to the use of the religious events of the special church.”
(Seoul Northern District Court 2014Kahap398). [Grounds for recognition: Statement Nos. 1 to 4 of Eul and the purport of all pleadings]
2. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff filed a false report despite the absence of an assault by the Plaintiff.