The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is recognized as favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, the support for the appearance of the defendant, etc. However, in light of the method of deception of this case and the degree of the amount of damage, the defendant has a record of being punished for the same kind of crime several times, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period due to the same kind of crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc., it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too excessive and unfair. Thus, the above unfair argument of the sentencing of the defendant and his defense counsel cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.