[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the E-In-house Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of real estate sale business, and Defendant B is the representative director of the F in-house, and Defendant C is the person who has been engaged in the asset management business on the basis of the experience in financial institutions, such as credit safe and savings bank, etc. for at least 30 years, and Defendant C is the person who has been engaged in the business of asset management at the hotel operated by Defendant C in the past by Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant A, and Defendant B, and the person who arranged for the remainder of Korea between Defendant C,

Defendant

A, on June 20, 2013, sold KRW 6,200,00 in the auction procedure for exercising a security right to “29,586 square meters of land (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) owned by the Busan District Court,” but was notified of KRW 4,116,237,490 as corporate tax on February 28, 2015 by the tax office with the payment deadline of KRW 4,116,237,490 as corporate tax on the instant real estate, in accordance with the auction procedure for exercising a security right to “29,586 square meters of land (hereinafter “the instant real estate”).

Accordingly, Defendant A filed a lawsuit with the Busan District Court to confirm the invalidity of the attachment disposition of claims, which is dissatisfied with the disposition of imposition of corporate tax against E in relation to the imposition of corporate tax, but the judgment against the Plaintiff was rendered by the Busan High Court on May 20, 2015, which was finally final and conclusive by the Supreme Court on October 15, 2015.

No person without a tax payment or a person who possesses property without a tax payment shall conceal or omit such property or make a false contract for the purpose of evading or evading the execution of a disposition on default.

On May 20, 2015, the Defendants conspired with Defendant A to obtain a judgment against the Plaintiff in a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the attachment disposition of claims against the Busan High Court on May 20, 2015, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive by the Supreme Court, the Defendants did not pay the corporate tax of 4,116,237,490 notified as above, and the remaining surplus remaining after the completion of the auction procedure for the instant real estate is the owner, as seen below, 59,387.