beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. 피고인 A의 재물 손괴 피고인은 2018. 3. 20. 00:22 경 광주 광산구 D에 있는 호프집에서, B이 다가와 기분 나쁜 말을 하였다는 이유로 화가 나, 그곳에 있던 피해자 E 소유의 테이블과 의자 등을 집어던지고 발로 찼다.
As a result, the Defendant damaged the property equivalent to 500,000 won at the market price, such as the table table and chair owned by the victim E.
2. Although the Defendants’ written indictment in this case includes omission of the name of the above crime in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (defence assault, etc.) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (defluence, etc.), the above crime is stated in the Act applicable to the name of the above crime, and the facts charged are also stated. The "established rules on the name of the crime to be stated in the indictment and the non-prosecution of indictment, etc." established by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office (hereinafter referred to as the "established rules on the name of the crime to be stated in the indictment and the non-prosecution of indictment"), it is necessary to separately state the name of the crime in light of the above provisions, such as the law applicable to the name of the crime.
Therefore, the name of the case attached to this case shall be used as it is, and the name of the crime shall be indicated ex officio without any changes in the indictment.
Defendant A voluntarily accompanied by a police officer who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report from the victim F (F) who is the operator of the head office in the preceding paragraph in relation to the crime referred to in the preceding paragraph. Defendant B was arrested as a victim of a fine, and was arrested as a victim of a fine, after completion of the investigation and the payment of a fine, the Defendants returned to the victim F who reported him at the time of returning to the site for the purpose of retaliation for the above report.
The Defendants, around March 20, 2018, at the above head office around 01:47, and Defendant B, an employee G (21 tax) at the president, and Defendant B, at the victim F, at the victim F.I.D.