(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.01.23 2013고단618

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.01.23 2013고단618

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2011, in a case where the victim C filed a complaint against the victim C, who is the seat of the defendant, for fraud, the defendant had guaranteed the payment of KRW 300 million to the victim and had the victim informed the victim of the cancellation of the complaint against the above D.

While the Defendant had been urged by the victim to pay the above amount of KRW 300 million, the Defendant had a copy of the electronic bill of KRW 100 million issued by the Company of Maamam Development (State), which was issued by the Company of Maamam Development (State), and had been able to seek more than three copies of the electronic bill of KRW 100 million, the Defendant received the said KRW 100 million from the Development of Maambam on his own as the price for the goods. If the Defendant borrowed money, he could immediately repay the said amount of the said amount of the said amount of the obligation, he borrowed the money as the security of the said bill and intended to distribute it with the said F.

1. On May 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the “H” office operated by the victim in the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, “H” (hereinafter “H”); (b) provided KRW 100,000,000,000,000 for the supply of goods equivalent to KRW 1 billion to the KBS Broadcasting Cooperative Operator, while operating the KBS Broadcasting Station Co., Ltd.; and (c) was unable to complete the supply due to shortage of money; and (d) lent KRW 100,00,000,000,000,000,000 won, which was received from the Roam Development as security. The Defendant paid the amount of the debt KRW 300,00,00,000,000,000

However, the fact is that the defendant did not deliver the goods to the Round development and the bill provided as security was delivered without checking the source from F, and there was no intention or ability to pay the bill normally.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and borrowed money from the victim.

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2016.10.27 2014고단3933 (1)

-창원지방법원 2018.05.25 2016고단976

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.11.12 2014고단1055

-대구지방법원서부지원 2020.09.16 2020고단2127

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.29 2017가단5071747