All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence (Defendant B: imprisonment of one year, additional collection of one year, 723,60,000 won, Defendant C’s imprisonment of six months, suspended execution of two years, observation of protection, community service, etc.) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment follows: (a) the Defendants were indicted on the charge that the Defendants recognized all the facts charged of the instant case; (b) the Defendants did not have any criminal record exceeding a fine; (c) Defendant C did not have any criminal record for the same kind of offense; and (d) the Defendants had to support their family members; (c) on the other hand, Defendant B was indicted on the charge that the Defendants arranged sexual traffic by assisting AD from the “AC” located in the north-gu, MaB to October 13, 2012 during the period from July 20, 2012 to around October 13, 2012; and (d) was punished on December 17, 2013; and (e) Defendant B filed an application for formal trial on February 2, 2014.

The Defendants committed the instant crime and continued to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic at the same place immediately after the police was controlled by the instant crime. Defendant B led the instant crime as the principal offender; Defendant C operated the instant crime; Defendant C operated the instant business establishment for a long time; operated the instant business establishment to have considerable sales and profits; the Defendants corrected iron papers to avoid the crackdown on the instant business establishment through digital fishing, installed a c-titity for the purpose of monitoring visitors to take measures to rectify the illegality in operating the instant business establishment; the Defendants attempted to be punished on the ground of Defendant A, the president of the first instance court, on the ground of co-defendant A, who is the president of the instant business establishment; in fact, Defendants were punished on behalf of Defendant H prior to being punished on the ground of the president of the instant business establishment; and the act of arranging sexual traffic has very serious harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, thereby doing so.