1. The Defendants, among each real estate listed in the separate sheet, share of Defendant B 15/50, shall be as to Defendant C, D, E, and F.

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 5 (including the number of branch offices) as to the primary cause of claim, according to the purport of the whole statement and pleadings as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including the number of branch offices). Eul was assessed as to each of the real estate listed in the separate list No. 1912, Dec. 8, 1912 (hereinafter "the real estate of this case"), Eul was newly constructed and resided in the real estate of this case, and Eul was registered as a resident around Oct. 20, 1968, when Eul occupied the real estate of this case, and Eul was deceased on May 25, 197. 6, the plaintiff was found to have occupied the real estate of this case by his heir No. 5, and the plaintiff was found to have been registered as the heir No. 2 of this case from his heir No. 95 to his heir No. 2, the deceased No. 20, the real estate of this case. Y No.

According to the above facts, from May 25, 1973, the deceased J has occupied the real estate of this case solely from around May 25, 1973, and such possession is presumed to have been occupied in good faith, peace, and public performance with the intention of ownership in accordance with Article 197(1) of the Civil Act.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 245(1) of the Civil Code, the deceased J shall begin the occupation of the real estate in this case.