logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.10.24 2012고단610
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From April 17, 2012 to 13:00 on April 17, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s marina business by force by force, such as gathering the string horse, which was not calculated from the catcop in the Eart store operated by the victim D, in other words, from the catcop of the eart store operated by the victim D, to the employees F, and continuously holding the cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of a fine (at the same time, several times), and the selection of a fine (at the latest hospital is receiving mental treatment, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the dismissal of prosecution for the provisional payment order in this part of the facts charged is that “The victim D, before the date and time in which the above facts charged were recorded, did assault once to the victim's inside part of the crime by drinking as the victim D met the defendant's behavior.”

This is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3). Since the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on August 8, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this part is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow