1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who was an administrative officer of the Blue House E, and the Defendant is a media company that runs its website (D; hereinafter “instant website”) via the Internet while publishing C, a general weekly newspaper.

B. On December 28, 2015, as a result of the negotiations on the Republic of Korea and Japan, the S and the Japan Government concluded a diplomatic conference with the Minister of Foreign Affairs on December 28, 2015, and concluded a "Negotiation on the Republic of Korea" with the promise of the final conclusion of the issues on the Republic of Korea and Japan.

(2) On January 6, 2016, K, a repair organization of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “K”), held a press conference and conducted a demonstration, holding a conclusion of the negotiations on the Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s

C. The Defendant reported the article as indicated in the [Attachment 3] to F’s title “G” on the homepage of the instant case (hereinafter “instant article 1”); and thereafter reported the article as indicated in the [Attachment 4] to H’s instant website and the magazines No. C 1384, respectively.

(이하 ‘이 사건 제2 기사’라 하고, 이 사건 제1 기사와 통틀어 ‘이 사건 기사들’이라 한다). [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1, 5, 6, 7호증(가지번호 있는 증거의 가지번호 �람, 이하 같다)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the facts are: (a) the Plaintiff’s assertion may cause physical collisions that may arise when K holds a meeting of exchange conference in the vicinity of the Embassy of Japan in front of the Embassy of Japan in Korea; and (b) by telephone to the Secretary General of K, who was known to the general public on January 4, 2016.

1. 6. The article of this case was merely rejected upon the request of the plaintiff to refrain from holding the meeting on January 4, 2016, and did not send letters related to the holding of the meeting to L on January 4, 2016. The defendant's false statement that "(i) the plaintiff instructed L to hold the meeting by means of text message, and (ii) K refused the plaintiff's order to hold the meeting and received an attack from the audience."