logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.01.14 2019나61922
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

【Supplementary Part 【No. 2 of the Decision of the first instance】 The following parts shall be added to the Decision of the second instance:

“The evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant agreed that the quality of rubber to be supplied between the Defendant and the Plaintiff had the quality of ethyl rubber as a ethyl rubber which has been sufficiently congested in the strong outer line of New Zealand. In addition, there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. Moreover, even based on the Defendant’s statement, the Defendant exported the ethyl rubber supplied through a separate processing process rather than exporting it as it is, and even if the Defendant received a claim for damages from another company supplied by the Defendant, it cannot be ruled out that there was a defect in the process during the Defendant’s processing process. Ultimately, the evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the damage was issued to the Defendant due to the defect in the supplied goods by the Plaintiff, and there is no

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow