logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.12.22 2017나106259
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the Parties:

On July 1, 2016, around 20:30, the traffic accident that the Plaintiff driven from the intersection between Seo-gu, Daejeon and C Apartment to C Apartment (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) and the E-to-land (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Orabab”) driving from the side of the Seo-gu, Daejeon High School into the Han field (hereinafter referred to as “the instant traffic accident”) led to the collision between the intersection.

B. The Plaintiff’s vehicle was destroyed due to the instant traffic accident, causing KRW 400,000 of the repair cost.

C. The defendant is an insurance company that entered into an automobile insurance contract for defendant Oral Sea.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The instant traffic accident occurred as the Plaintiff’s vehicle was found later and did not stop Defendant Oba, which was the result of Defendant Oba, due to Defendant Oba’s failure to perform the duty of ebbacy, even though the Plaintiff’s vehicle was entering the intersection first.

The instant accident is an accident arising from the total negligence of Defendant Oralba.

B. The Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped at the front temporary stop line of the crosswalk and confirmed whether another vehicle is going through the intersection, and the vehicles passing the intersection should enter the intersection after passing through the intersection, but neglected to turn left and right at the intersection while the vehicle passes through the intersection.

Plaintiff

Vehicles violated the obligation of temporary suspension and interfered with the passage of Defendant Otoba in the form of occupying the road on which Defendant Otoba is running.

The plaintiff's vehicle that proceeds from a narrow road has a duty to yield the course to the defendant's Oral Sea that proceeds from a wide road.

Considering this point, the negligence of the Plaintiff’s vehicle is.

arrow