1. The Defendant’s KRW 60,728,567 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from October 15, 2014 to July 21, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 14, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant leased temporary materials between the Defendant and the Defendant on the following terms, and entered into a contract with the Defendant to pay the sales price at KRW 165 million in exchange for payment in lieu of the C building 1031 at Jeju, and to pay the balance after deducting the rent for the temporary materials (hereinafter “the instant lease contract”). On the Jeju-si Airport Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”), the Plaintiff, a partner of the Defendant, leased the temporary materials at the site for the new construction of the family hotel located in D (hereinafter “the first site”) and at the site for the new construction of the E church located in Seopopopo-si (hereinafter “the second site”).

(1) Rent shall be calculated in accordance with the calculation method of rental fees based on the basic fee and daily user fee in accordance with attached Form 1 unit price table.

(2) When leasing materials are returned, a loss shall be settled at the cost of loss based on the detailed statement (in cases of rental goods not entered in the detailed statement, the sale of price information sheet shall apply mutatis mutandis).

(3) Upon the expiration of the lease term, the lessee shall return without delay, within the place of business designated by the lessor, the place of return shall be within the area of business designated by the lessor, separate the quantity by standard and return together with a invoice, and the quantity not confirmed by the lessee shall be according to the quantity confirmed by the lessor and the lessee shall not raise any objection.

(4) If it is impossible to repair the article in its original form at the time of return, it shall be disposed of as scrapped articles, and the lessee shall pay it to the lessor by applying the cost of destruction within

B. From May 14, 2014 to June 25, 2014, the Plaintiff leased the same as the first site lease statement and the second site lease statement, respectively, to the Defendant. The Nonparty Company renounced construction works among the policemen on July 2014. The Defendant, a first site subcontractor, and the second site construction company, a second site subcontractor.