logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.05.15 2018고합330
살인
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for 18 years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the charges do not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, some revisions were made in accordance with facts obtained through the examination of evidence.

In particular, among the facts charged, the defendant had the intention of a planned murder against the victim. However, as seen later, the defendant seems to have had the intention of dolusorous murder. Therefore, the defendant was corrected accordingly.

1. The Defendant and the victim’s related Defendant are those who reside in the apartment B apartment B apartment of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim D (manam and 71) was employed as the above apartment security guard and worked in the way of taking a rest in the security service and guard room for 24 hours, and were working in the way of leaving the said apartment security room at their own house and leaving the house to rest for 24 hours.

2. According to the statement by G residing in the upper floor at the time around December 2014, the Defendant: (a) around December 2014, G had a director as the above apartment H around December 2014; (b) since around two weeks after the Defendant raised an issue of noise between floors; (c) it appears that the Defendant’s noise problem raised between the floors was started from the point of time.

Since then, it has been thought that the apartment residents living in the upper floor of the above residential area have continuously caused noise between floors, and therefore the peaceful life has been hindered.

Since that time, the defendant demanded that the subject of apartment management work and his employees resolve the noise problem between floors, but it was thought that the noise between floors was not resolved at a satisfactory level from the defendant's perspective.

In particular, from around October 2018, the Defendant thought that there was no adequate measure taken by the victim on the issue of noise between his own floors, and at the same time, according to the civil petition receipt date (No. 41) that the attitude of the victim was not friendly, the Defendant on October 25, 2018.

arrow