logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고단2197
명예훼손등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. From September 2014, the Defendant is the Chairperson of the Management Committee for Apartment Buildings in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, and the victim D is the resident of the above apartment, and the victim E was employed as the accounting of the above apartment on July 31, 2015, and was the above apartment management complaint from October 1 of the same year.

A. On November 9, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice poster at 10 bulletin boards located in the Dong-gu Seoul apartment complex around November 9, 2015, and the Defendant, despite that the victim D, who is a resident, is not a speech victim, posted a speech assault resident (4 times) on the agenda (910 D), thereby spreading false information to the residents of 120 households of the above apartment building, clearly stating that the content of the notice is referred to the Conciliation Committee for Conciliation of Language Violence (910 D).

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2) On November 9, 2015, the Defendant committed assault by having the victim D, who was in the above place, go beyond the floor by being pushed down with the Defendant’s left hand, on the ground that the victim D was in accordance with the foregoing written notice at the entrance of the apartment complex center in Gwangju-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

B. On November 15, 2015, the Defendant posted a poster with the result of a meeting of executive officers at the place described in paragraph (1) (A) around November 15, 2015 in the manner described in paragraph (1) in the same manner as that stated in paragraph (1). The Defendant again stated that “the resolution on the charge of speech assault (910 D), obstructing the meeting of executive officers, obstructing the police report (2) of language assault (2), obstructing the performance of duties when a serious warning occurs, obstructing the recurrence of a serious warning, causing defamation and verbal assault” in four times among the contents.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

(c)

On November 24, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime by around November 24, 2015, the fact that the Victim E was a victim’s 120 household mail in Dong-gu, Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, about November 24, 2015 is not a divulgence of public secrets, and even though the mental state is not suspected, the warden’s “the extent to which the warden divulges public secrets and suspicions the mental state that prevents the release of the ceiling.”

arrow