A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and six months for special robbery at the Cheongju District Court, and on September 29, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and one year and six months for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Incheon District Court on September 29, 201, and the said sentence became final and conclusive on February 15, 201, and the said suspended sentence became void upon the final and conclusive judgment, and on March 28, 2014, the Defendant was released on March 28, 2014 while serving the sentence, and the remaining period of the sentence has expired on June 28, 201

On July 3, 2014, at around 04:00, the Defendant opened a car door that was parked at the Cheongju-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and opened the car, 2.1 U.S. dollars 10, 20 U.S. dollars 1, 20 U.S. dollars 1, 20 U.S. dollars 1, 20 U.S. dollars 1, 20

From around that time to July 30, 2014, the Defendant stolen the victims’ property habitually over 14 times in total, such as the list of crimes in the annexed sheet.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor and police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each statement of C, D, E, F, G, and H;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure, photographs of damaged articles, and records of examination and storage of suspects;

1. Previous records before ruling: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (Attachment of judgment), and results of prisoners' search;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the fact that each crime history, method of commission of crime and the same kind of crime in the judgment are systematically repeated;

1. Article 5-4 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of limited imprisonment for a crime;

1. The proviso to Article 35 and the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence for the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended sentence] is the basic area (2 to 4 years) of the sentence for habitual and repeated larceny.