logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017.08.11 2017나10700
보험에 관한 소송
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 15, 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded the instant insurance contract with the Defendant as the insured.

B. From April 25, 2002 to May 29, 2009, among the Defendant’s insurance policies asserted by the Defendant that the Defendant concluded with himself as the insured, the insurance that was already terminated at the time of the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, and the pension insurance, group insurance, life insurance, traffic insurance, driver insurance, housing fire insurance, and savings insurance that cannot be seen as similar in terms of the content and nature of the instant insurance contract.

The details of the statement are as listed below:

The entry of "stock company" below 1KDB life insurance, which is the product name of the insurance company, is omitted.

On April 25, 202, 201 G-1, 45,30 - G-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2, and 310 - 20 - 3,00 - non-dividend 20, 300 - 30,000 - 30, 200 - 30, 200 - 30,00 - 40,00 - 40,00 - 40,00 non-dividend 2,00 - 1,50,000 2,000 - 1,50,000 - 2,00 - 1,50,000 - 2,00 2,06,00 - 1,000 - 30,000 - 1,00 5,000 - 1,009

arrow