1. On June 8, 2008, around 19:35, the vehicles of D Driving E are moving from the vicinity of C department located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B.

1. The occurrence of liability for damages: (1) at around 19:35 on June 8, 2008, D was negligent in neglecting the duty to see the moving direction while driving the E vehicle in the vicinity of the C store located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and neglecting the duty to see during the stop, and caused injury to the Defendant’s front part of the said vehicle, which was trying to catch a taxi at a certain point, by shocking the front part of the said vehicle into the rear part of the said vehicle for two weeks (hereinafter “instant accident”); (2) The fact that the Plaintiff is the insurer who entered into the comprehensive automobile insurance contract with D as to the said vehicle does not conflict between the parties, or that the Plaintiff is the insurer who entered into the said automobile with D, is liable for compensation for the damages suffered by the Defendant due to the instant accident, as the insurer of the said vehicle, in full view of the purport of oral arguments as set forth in subparagraphs A and 2.

2. Scope of damages.

A. The part acknowledged as follows: (a) even if the Defendant had been receiving treatment for at least 2 years including 68 days after the instant accident, the Plaintiff and the Defendant continuously complained of the Complex Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-.