208 Highly Injury by occupational negligence in 2008

208 initially 641 Application for compensation order

1.COICO000), Company Members

Residence, Kim Jong-si or lower-level omission

5. Omission of Gyeongnam:

2. Periodical (00000-0000) and Company Members; and

Not more than the beginning of the dwelling house;

5. Omission of Gyeongnam:

Magwon

Changwon Law Firm, Attorney COCO (for the defendant)

Maximum CO ( Address: Omission below Changwon-si)

Legal Representative MoCO

July 11, 2008

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of each of the above punishments against the Defendants is suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive. The application for compensation by the applicant for compensation is dismissed.

Criminal facts

Defendant Jeong CO is the owner of 6 horse, such as a shot-use match flick flick flick flick. Defendant O was entrusted with raising 200,000 won per month from Defendant HaOO and raised and managed the shot flick in the open space located in the Chang-si, Chang-si. The Defendants are those who walk in the above shot flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick fl, flick flish flick flick flish fl, and after the flick flick flish flish flick flick fl.

Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected to do so and arranged the shot gun at a distance of about five meters from the above cargo lane, and the Defendant was able to write down the shot dog in one string line after connecting the shot dog to the said shot dog, and then, the Defendants shot the shot dog in one knife with another knife with the shot dog in one knife with the shot dog in one knife with the shot dog. The Defendants shot the shot dog outside of the opening and the victim sCO9 who was playing in the said playground.

Ultimately, the Defendants conspired to receive approximately six weeks of medical treatment from the victim by negligence in the course of the above business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement of the police against the tearCO;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A medical certificate;

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Articles 268 and 30 of the Criminal Code

1. Suspension of execution;

Article 62 (1) of each Criminal Code (Taking into account the fact that the accused is against himself and that the considerable amount has been deposited for the repayment of damage, etc.)

1. Dismissal of application for compensation;

Articles 25(3) and 32(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings

The reason for sentencing is that the defendants should be punished strictly considering the following facts: (a) the defendants are more dangerous than other general dogs or pet dogs raised at home; and (b) the defendants have suffered a large amount of physical and mental suffering from the age of 9 living; (c) the defendants have no special criminal history other than fines; and (d) the defendants have no special criminal history other than fines, and (e) the defendants have deposited KRW 20,000,000 in order to pay damages later.

Judges Jin-jin