The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that the victim alleged a misunderstanding of facts made a statement to the purport that the fact of damage is not memory in the court of original instance, reversed the statement about the content of damage, damage situations and date and time of damage, partly reversed the statement made by the police, each of the statements made by the court of original instance and the police differs from the other party who notified the initial fact of damage, the other party who was notified by the victim was attending the course at the time of damage, and there is a possibility that the victim would have made a false statement in order to refuse the course of driving school education or to attract the interest of the parents, it is difficult to view that the victim's statement has credibility, and the court below convicted each of the charges of this case on the basis of the victim's statement without credibility. The court below erred

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The court below found the victim guilty of the facts charged by taking into account the following facts: (a) the victim consistently states the core contents of the damage from the investigative agency to the court; (b) there is no room to bring about the victim’s memory until the victim made a statement after the occurrence of the case in light of the circumstances of the complaint and investigation; and (c) the victim’s motive or circumstance to make a false statement unfavorable to the defendant; and (d) the victim’s statement is not found to be reliable; and (b) a thorough examination of the judgment of the court below in comparison with the evidence, it appears that the judgment of the court below is reasonable. 2) Further to the above judgment of the court below, the above judgment of the court below was adopted and investigated by each evidence adopted and investigated by the court below; (i) the victim wants to stop the damage under