A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from around 19:50 on May 26, 2015 to around 00:02 on May 27, 2015, 301, purchased in the Daegu Dong-gu DaMobel 301 on a vinyl paper, in a way that he puts four industrial main 160g g of the Toluene, containing lusent ingredients, into a vinyl paper, and inhales hallucinogenic substances over a period of about four hours, in a way that he inhales them into a vinyl and into a vinyl paper.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Photographs and investigation report (the other party investigation of the telecom proprietor E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing requests for appraisal;

1. The "Harmful Chemicals Control Act" shall be deemed to be a clerical error in the "Chemical Chemicals Control Act" in the pertinent Article of criminal facts and written indictment for the selection of punishment. Thus, it shall be corrected ex officio.

Article 59(6) and Article 22(1), Selection of Imprisonment

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, Etc. [the scope of recommending punishment] the basic area (six to one year) of medication, simple possession, etc. [the decision of sentence] [the defendant has no history of punishment for the same kind of crime (one time of suspension of the execution of imprisonment and one time of fine)], and the defendant once again inhales hallucinogenic substances, the previous crime is committed before 5 to 10 years, and the crime of this case is committed only once, the defendant has committed the crime of this case, and the defendant has expressed his/her intention to endeavor to prevent recidivism, taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.