beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,406,773 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from August 1, 2014 to April 16, 2015, and the following.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The plaintiff and the defendant bear half of the purchase price around May 14, 2006, and the Korea Rural Community Corporation (title at the time: the Korea Rural Community Corporation and the Korea Rural Community Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Rural Community Corporation”) shall be referred to as “Korea Rural Community Corporation”.
(C) 588m20,000,000,000,00
(2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to jointly purchase shares of 113.7/154.3 square meters (hereinafter “E”) in Gangnam-gu, Seoul and the Sinnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul and 217.9 square meters (hereinafter “F land”), and jointly purchase shares of c 1 land and e land and e land and hereinafter “the instant land”). The Plaintiff and the registered titleholder agreed to jointly purchase shares of c 1 land and e land, E, and F c 217.9 square meters (hereinafter “F land”). The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to jointly purchase shares of 13.7/154 square meters in Seoul and 154 square meters in early September 206, 2006, which are owned by the agricultural and fishing village Corporation.
The plaintiff entered into a sales contract with D, and on October 13, 2006, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the G future and in the case of F land, respectively.
3) The Plaintiff: (a) around August 2006, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, a farmland owned by H, 122 square meters (hereinafter “I 2 land”).
b) D Co., Ltd. entered into each of the above sales contracts by forging documents without being delegated with the authority to dispose of the documents and forging documents. In this regard, the charges of forging private documents were indicted for four years.
2) An action seeking the cancellation of the ownership transfer registration completed in the name of J 1, 2, and E against the Plaintiff, G, and H (this Court Decision 2007Da18392) against the Plaintiff, G, and H (the above ownership transfer registration) was rendered in favor of the Plaintiff, G, and H. The above ownership transfer registration is all filed.