The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The Defendant asserts that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as the grounds for appeal of this case are too unreasonable.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case and the fact that the defendant had a substitute engineer drive in the vicinity of his residence, and his depth is divided, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, since the defendant's appeal is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following is ruled again.

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the criminal facts of the defendant recognized by this court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the corresponding columns of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they shall be quoted by Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (this regular consideration in determining the grounds for appeal);