All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence imposed by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. All the Defendants have no benefit from the instant crime, reflects the mistake, and have no record of the crime.

However, the crime of transferring access media is likely to undermine the stability and reliability of electronic financial transactions and cause secondary damage because it is abused for other crimes such as telephone financing fraud, etc.

Defendants committed the instant crime in return for considerable consideration, as well as the access media that actually transferred by the Defendants were used for the crime of Boishing.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and the Defendants’ respective ages, environment, sexual conduct, and motive for committing a crime, and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the pleadings, it cannot be said that the lower court’s each sentence imposed on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in entirety in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit.