logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.20 2015고정1525
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM5 car.

On February 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 04:00, and proceeded with the roads front of the 159 new Han River-ro 5 apartment complex, 523 Nail-si, the 159 New River-ro 159 New River-ro 159.

At the time, it was difficult to reduce the accident at night, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes of the motor vehicle which is well seeing the front side and the right side and the right side and the right side of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and escaped without taking any measure so that the central separation bar, which is a traffic facility that is managed by the construction and transportation of the building department of the victim-oriented viewing department, is the front part of the Defendant vehicle, and the central separation bar was destroyed by the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle and the amount equivalent to KRW 3,656,587, which is the cost of repairing the central separation salary.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. The actual survey report and the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. Application of the statutes governing a written estimate;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the penalty prescribed in the summary order shall be partially reduced by taking into account the following: (a) the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order; (b) the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; and (c) the Central Separation Salary destroyed through the subordinate company of competent viewing after the prosecution of this case

arrow