logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.12.02 2016나1452
배당이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is to be cited by the court of first instance on the grounds of the second 19th "No. 2, 3, and 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance" with "No. 2, 5" with "No. 5 of the judgment of the court of second 19," and the following descriptions are as stated in the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition after the third 12th one.

In the appellate brief dated 28, 2016, which was stated on October 14, 2016, the Plaintiff changed the purport of the claim to the effect that the mortgage contract concluded on January 17, 2013 between the Defendant and E should be revoked by fraudulent act, while the Plaintiff did not change the purport of the claim to the same effect.

However, as to the plaintiff's assertion that the above mortgage contract was a fraudulent act, there is no evidence to prove that the above mortgage contract was in excess of E at the time of signing the above mortgage contract. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and it is dismissed as the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow