1. All the judgment below is reversed.

2. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and two months, and the defendant B by imprisonment for six months.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendants (one year and two months of imprisonment, confiscation, defendant B: six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case against Defendant A is highly harmful to society by encouraging the citizens’ excessive speculative spirit and hindering sound labor, and there is a need to strictly punish the Defendant as a serious crime. The Defendant has the records of having been punished for the same kind of crime, etc. However, in light of the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, on the other hand, the Defendant is living under confinement for about seven months, and there was no actual profit by regulating the game machine in the process of displaying and keeping it. In the case of the case of the 2013 large-scale large-scale large-scale 805, the Defendant provided the name in the case of the 2013 large-scale 2013 large-scale 913, but the Defendant was not directly involved in the operation or exchange, but the Defendant’s family and person wished to take advantage of the Defendant’s wife against the Defendant, and the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family relationship, environment, etc., as well as other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case

3. The crime of this case against Defendant B is highly likely to cause serious social harm, such as encouraging the citizens’ excessive speculative spirit and undermining sound labor awareness, and there is a need to strictly punish the Defendant as an offense. The Defendant has the record of having been punished for the same kind of crime, etc., which is disadvantageous to the Defendant. Meanwhile, the Defendant recognized the crime of this case, which is against the wrongness, and the Defendant is currently engaged in a door-to-door business, and thus, when performing community service order, the Defendant would have a significant impact on his occupation. In full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records