1. The Defendants each of the Plaintiff B, KRW 69,190,09, KRW 66,690,09, and KRW 2,000,00, and each of the above costs.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant E and Defendant F are doctors who operated the “Iwon (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) at Gangseo-si H at the time G.

Plaintiff

C is a woman in childbed who has a career of 3.78 km in J, and is a woman in childbed in G Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “the deceased”), and Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff C and the father of the deceased child, and Plaintiff D is the mother of the deceased.

The deceased was born at the Defendant hospital and died on December 5, 2011.

B. On June 26, 2010, Plaintiff C was diagnosed as 6 weeks of pregnancy to Defendant E at the Defendant Hospital, and received a pre-delivery examination at the Defendant Hospital on several occasions, around June 26, 2010. (2) Plaintiff C requested the Defendant Hospital on February 18, 201, which was the fourth day of pregnancy 38 weeks, to conduct a pre-treatment, and the Plaintiff C agreed to undergo a pre-delivery surgery on February 24, 201.

3) However, on February 23, 2011, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital proposed that the Plaintiff C be in a spacific surgery rather than the spacific surgery because there is no need to implement the spacific surgery. On March 23, 201, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital presumed that the spacific body part of the deceased was 3.5km to 3.3.63km, and that the Plaintiff C was in a spacific acid, which was similar to the spacific body in around 2008, and that the Plaintiff’s spacific surgery was appropriate to conduct the spacific surgery. The Plaintiff agreed that the spacific surgery was conducted at the Defendant Hospital on March 2 of the same year after receiving the spacific surgery at the Defendant Hospital, and as a result, the Plaintiff C decided to induce the Plaintiff to administer only the G spacific surgery to the Plaintiff at the Defendant Hospital 1000.