1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The plaintiff asserts that the disposition of this case was illegal because it was not given a considerable period of time to implement the corrective order, and it did not go through the prior notice procedure of the disposition.

However, as the judgment of the court of first instance properly states, in light of ① the fact that the contents of the corrective order are to remove the vinyl and restore the current status of the land to the original state, it cannot be deemed that the period of restoration granted by the Defendant to the Plaintiff is not a considerable period for implementing the corrective order. ② In full view of the content of the “the first order and the corrective order,” attached thereto, up to the time period and contents of the “the second order and the corrective order,” it is reasonable to view that the “the second order and the corrective order” are a prior notice of the disposition, and are practically guaranteed the Plaintiff the opportunity to state his opinion.

The plaintiff's assertion cannot be accepted.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.