beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. Crimes against victims D;
A. On May 22, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D by phone calls at the Defendant’s residence located in Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, that “The Defendant would pay the principal after paying interest every week on a one-time loan to the victim D for the commencement of a high-speed sales business.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any specific plan to conduct the secondary and secondary sales business and thought to use the money individually, so even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to pay the principal and interest.
Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 5,00,000 from the victim on May 22, 2014, and received KRW 500,000 from the victim on or around May 28, 2013, and received KRW 7,00,000, such as receiving KRW 1,50,000 from the victim on or around June 8, 2013.
B. On June 2013, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, called “The Defendant sent golf bonds to 700,000 won, because he would sell golf bonds to 70,000 won.”
However, in fact, the defendant thought that golf loans will be used individually, so even if he received golf loans from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the funds.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and obtained golf loans equivalent to the market price of 700,000 won from the victim around that time.
2. Crimes against victim F;
A. On December 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around December 5, 2013, at the “H restaurant” operated by the Victim F located in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon G, the Defendant sent his children with language training to the U.S.
In order to transfer KRW 1,00,000 to down payment, it was false to the effect that it would send training until December 25, 2013.
However, the defendant did not work in relation to fishery training.