logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.09.24 2015고단2250
협박등
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was known by the Defendant at around 2007 that he was first aware of the Victim D and brought about her husband and her husband, and around 2008 that she became aware of the fact that she was the victim, and even around July 2012, her marriage with her husband and her husband had been bluened and continued with her marriage with her husband and her husband.

A. (1) In August 201, the Defendant threatened the Victim D with intimidation (A) on the following grounds: (a) within the victim’s passenger car, the Defendant: (b) during the first half of the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Gela in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, on the ground that the victim does not have any contact, and (c) on the ground that the victim does not have any contact with the victim and does not have any contact, the Defendant threatened the victim.”

(B) On July 2012, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that the victim was a woman living together with her husband, the Defendant sent a Kakakao Stockholm text message to the victim’s handphone with his Handphone, stating that “I will file a complaint, I will see, I will do so; and (b) I will do so.”

(C) In 2014, the criminal suspect sent a Kakao Stockholm text message to the victim’s Handphone with the following purport: (a) the victim returned home at early 2014, who did not contact the victim; (b) the victim’s Handphone, who notified him/her of the victim’s Handphone, and notified him/her of all, of the omission.”

(D) On August 17, 2015, the Defendant sought to hear the horses that the victim was living well with her husband and sought to confirm the victim. However, on August 17, 2015, at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the victim did not receive a telephone, and at around 21:16, around Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the victim’s handphone with his handphone, and the victim’s handphone was sent to the Handphone of the victim.

Dora, whether or not it will be changed to the nitiusn, or to be changed to the nitn, alar, alar, alar before the nitation, alar, alar and alar;

The sound will and the path, ..

arrow