beta
Text
Defendant
N,O, or E Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 15, 2015, Defendant N was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of the imprisonment of six months for fraud in this court, and the judgment was finalized on the 23th of the same month.
Defendant
A On June 26, 2014, this Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for fraud and three-year imprisonment for the same year.
7.4. The judgment became final and conclusive.
Criminal facts
1. The Defendants’ joint crime (Fraud) Defendant N is the owner of the F apartment 101 Dong 504, Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, and Defendant O is a real estate intermediary, and Defendant E and A have been engaged in real estate sales business.
Defendant
On April 16, 2013, N purchased the above apartment without any special financial power and offered loans of KRW 290 million from the New Saemaeul Treasury of Gangnam-dong with a loan of KRW 200 million to the new Saemaeul Credit Cooperative of KRW 377,00,000, and it was discovered to dispose of the above real estate due to the lack of economic circumstances and due to the lack of economic circumstances, N received a proposal from Defendant E and T to pay part of the lease deposit if it was delegated to Defendant E and A to enter into a lease contract at the coffee shop located in the territory of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on August 2013, and then offered to Defendant E and T to Defendant O, who knew the above circumstances, by entering in the lease contract with the Defendant’s name and transfer the deposit account in the name of the Defendant.
Defendant
(O) around August 27, 2013, at an officially authorized brokerage office located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City U, the lessee W was delegated by Defendant N with the terms of the lease contract to the lessee W.
At the same time, a lease contract was concluded between October 3, 2013 and October 2, 2015 with respect to the above apartment as the victim can maintain the lease relationship in accordance with the terms of the contract with the victim.
However, at the time of fact, at the time of the above apartment, the amount of the loan has already reached KRW 290 million, and Defendant N.