The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too heavy to the defendants.

2. The Defendants recognized the crime and reflected the crime, and made efforts to recover the damage caused by business obstruction by placing the victim-owned articles on the spot.

There are circumstances to take into account the circumstances of crimes.

However, in full view of the fact that the Defendants led the crime, and the police did not discontinue the crime despite the fact that the victims reported on the scene of the crime, and other sentencing conditions in the records of this case, including the mother and child interested parties, the age, sex, environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, the lower court’s punishment seems to be appropriate.

3. Conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed on the grounds that it is without merit.