1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against each of the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below is revoked.

1. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The grounds for this part of the judgment on the plaintiffs' grounds for appeal are as follows: (a) the "2. Party's assertion" and "3. Judgment" in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (b) whether to cancel the sales contract; and (b) "reparates and compensates for damages due to the cancellation of the supply contract (Articles 5.7 through 9.10)"; and (c) therefore, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the fifth below, Article 3(3) of the 8th sentence "Article 3(2)" shall be read as "Article 3(2)".

Article 7-9 of the 6th 7th 7th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth

Each “Plaintiff” in the last 6-6-6-6-6-1-7-7-1-7-2-7-1-2-8-2-8-2-8-2-8-2-8-2-2-2-3-2-

Under the 7th day, each "87 days" of the 6th and 4th day shall be "7 days".

Under the 8th below, the 5-4 “Plaintiffs” shall be deleted.

3. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. As to the defense of reduction of penalty, penalty under Article 3(2) of the respective supply contract between the plaintiffs and the defendant constitutes an estimate for damages.

However, there is a problem.