Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not harm the identity of the facts charged and the defendant's right to defense, part of the facts charged was revised and stated in accordance with evidence.

The defendant is a vice-manager of C hotel, and the victim D is an employee of the above hotel.

On December 17, 2017, at around 11:00, the Defendant asked the head of F division of the victim D (24 tax, n, n, n) to the end that his parents divorced before the victim D (24 tax n, n, n, n) was divorced, and even though there was no such fact, the Defendant sustained a defect in the course of making the back into the wall and the passage to the outside of the sofet by putting the back part of the woman's left part, and caused the injury to the wall and the left part of the 14 days in need of medical treatment by going beyond the floor.

[Defendant and defense counsel claim that even though the defendant raised the victim, the victim only saw as a part of the victim and did not inflict any injury.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim D, witness G, and F were faced with the wall and the bridge in the process of consistently attracting the victim.

The above legal statements are consistent with the statements made by investigative agencies, in particular, witness G, and F do not seem to have made a false statement at the risk of being punished for perjury to gather the defendant as subordinate staff working in the hotel like the defendant. The victim caused the crime of this case by the crime of this case to the investigation agency and submitted the damaged photograph to the investigation agency. The victim was issued a written diagnosis of injury, such as the left left left satis, the left satis, the left satise satum, the left satum, etc. on the following day of the occurrence of this case. The above injury diagnosis has considerable credibility.

It appears that the victim of the defendant and his defense counsel had been treated before.