All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all the revised charges against the Defendants were guilty.

In so determining, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the evidence for reinforcement of confession, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Defendant

The ground of appeal, among the facts charged against A, that the hospitalized part from June 16, 2009 to July 14, 2009 was not false, is not a legitimate ground of appeal, since the defendant A’s ground of appeal or the court below did not consider it as being subject to judgment ex officio, is not a legitimate ground of appeal.

According to Article 383 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is declared, an appeal can be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing.

Therefore, in this case where the defendants were sentenced to a more minor punishment, the assertion that punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate appeal.

The Defendants’ final appeal is dismissed in entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.