The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the court below's decision that there was no proof of crime against the conjunctive facts charged in the revised indictment of this case is justified.

The court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on election campaigns committed in violation of Article 230(1)4 and Article 135(3) of the Election of Public Officials Act.

Meanwhile, the prosecutor appealed to the acquittal portion of the lower judgment as to the primary facts charged of this case, but did not state the grounds of appeal on the petition of appeal or the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.