1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasons for this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments as to Defendant C’s assertion in this case. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination as to Defendant C’s assertion

A. Defendant C borrowed KRW 10,000,000 from the Plaintiff and repaid all of them thereafter.

In addition, Defendant C did not guarantee the Plaintiff’s obligation to borrow 36,00,000 won, and Defendant C’s certificate Nos. 2 (cash storage certificate) stating such content is affixed to Defendant C’s seal.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement Nos. 2, 3, and 1-1, 1-B, and 1-B, the Defendants filed a complaint with the Defendants on March 16, 2006, and the agreement was reached on June 9, 2008, and they were living together even after the lapse of the agreement, and the Plaintiff lent a total of KRW 40,000,000 to Defendant C separately; ③ the balance of KRW 40,000,000,000, out of KRW 10,000,000, KRW 36,000,000, KRW 100,000, KRW 200, KRW 100,000, KRW 300, KRW 10,000, KRW 300, KRW 100,000, KRW 100,000, KRW C100,000, KRW 300,000.