The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 22:25 on May 9, 2014, the Defendant, at around 22:25, called the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2nd floor “C” restaurant and went to the restaurant.

Since then, the Defendant told the victim D(53 years of age and inn) of his cell phone that he was able to read, but the Defendant sought a cafeteria “C” restaurant where the victim was a victim who heard the victim’s speech from the victim, and told the victim that he would drink in the same way as the victim did so.

In other words, the Defendant tried to hear the horses from the victim, and assaulted the victim by taking two times the head of the victim who continued to go beyond the victim, i.e., “I have come to know that I have come well,” and “I have come to know that I have come to go well.”

2. The offense of assault is a crime not prosecuted against the victim’s clearly expressed intent (Article 260(1) and (3) of the Criminal Act). The victim D expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the defendant on July 14, 2014 after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.