logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.08.17 2018가단102011
용역비
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 105,00,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from June 11, 2017 to December 29, 2017; and (b) the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff shall accept a subcontract from the defendant on December 9, 2016 for the construction period of "Catho-gun Duna-gun Model Ear Work for Lodging Facility Establishment of New Lodging Facilities" with the amount of KRW 105,000 (within 10 days from May 30, 2017, the remainder of the payment date of value-added tax) on December 10, 2016; and it may be recognized that the above model was manufactured and set up at the above Model Eatus site on March 3, 2017, and there is no counter-proof.

According to this, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 105,00,000 won for the payment of the above construction cost and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 6% per annum under the Commercial Act from June 11, 2017 to December 29, 2017, which is the delivery date of a copy of the complaint (the original copy of payment order) of this case, and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment.

2. 피고의 주장에 관한 판단 피고는, 이 사건 공사의 원수급인 주식회사 퀸오브마리나가 이 사건 모형의 실사용자로서 그 용역대금을 지급할 책임이 있을 뿐 피고에게 지급책임이 없다고 다투나, 이 사건 계약 명의자 및 도급인이 피고이므로 위 주장은 이유 없다.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow