1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 52,589,727 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its payment from July 7, 2015 to December 28, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ status and the conclusion of the responsible execution contract are 1) The Defendant is a company established for the purpose of electrical construction business and telecommunications equipment construction business. 2) The Plaintiff was working as the vice president from around 2007 to the Defendant, and the Plaintiff was entrusted by the Defendant in a lump sum with the telecommunications and electrical construction received from the SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SK Telecom”), and the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff a certain amount of equity (mail Corporation, 80%, 2012, 78%, 2013, and 90% for electrical construction) of the amount obtained by deducting four premiums, etc. from the value of supply.

(hereinafter the above Telecommunication Corporation’s “Telecommunications Corporation,” and electrical construction “the instant electrical construction”). B.

(1) On February 3, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted the Plaintiff’s written application, etc. (1) The Plaintiff did not pay the Plaintiff the construction cost for the year 2012 and 2013 in the SK Telecom. The Plaintiff’s unpaid amount is KRW 40 million in the settlement of the insurance premium for the deceased employee, KRW 10 million in the corporate tax settlement, KRW 5.6 million in the settlement of accounts, KRW 20 million in the communication office, KRW 7.2 million in the office materials, KRW 34 million in the office materials, KRW 206,80,000 in the aggregate of KRW 206,80,00 in the office materials, KRW 34 million in the office materials, and KRW 206,80,000 in the sum (hereinafter “instant application”).

(2) On March 26, 2014, the Plaintiff respectively prepared and issued a receipt stating that “I, upon receipt on March 26, 2014, prove that I had been paid the Plaintiff on March 26, 2014” and “I, on April 14, 2014, agree that I would not object to the case on which I had filed a complaint against the Plaintiff with the same police station.”

C. Since February 2013 to December 2013, 2013, the representative member D of the Defendant’s criminal case, the Plaintiff performed the said construction by “E” while performing the construction of the facilities of the SST base station.