A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who had a record of being sentenced to a summary order of KRW 8 million at the Jung-gu District Court on November 7, 2007 due to a fine of KRW 2 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Jung-gu District Court on October 5, 2012, a fine of KRW 3.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Jung-gu District Court on October 5, 201, and a fine of KRW 8 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on May 14, 2013) at the Jung-gu District Court on May 14, 2013;

1. Starting in front of a mutual influent restaurant located in the ancient moo-Eup of Mancheon-si on May 13, 2013 of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at around 13:50 on May 13, 2013, and driving a motor vehicle with Cromatic alcohol concentration of 0.091 percent at a section of 500 meters up to the same maid intersection without a driver’s license, without a motor vehicle driver’s license;

2. On May 13, 2013, at least 14:20 on the 14:20th day of the forgery of private documents, it was discovered that it was driven without a license or a drunk driving under the above Paragraph (1) and that the light-line D belonging to the traffic control system of the Macheon Police Station offers E’s resident registration number, name, etc. based on the Defendant’s statement and confirmed that the above entries are identical to the fact as the person subject to the suspension of license, and notified that blood collection may be conducted if it is recognized and unfair as a result of measurement, it does not want blood collection.” On May 13, 2013, the letter “E” is written as “E” and the letter “E” is written as the signature column stating that “A, which is a private document related to the certification of fact, shall be forged with a report on the de facto driving under the name of the above E, which is a private document related to the certification of fact, to exercise the Defendant’s unmanned on its name.

3. The aforementioned police officers D, who knew of the forgery at the same time, and at the same place as the above paragraph 2 above, delivered the falsified report on the state of driving under the influence of the police officer D as if it was a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The protocol of statement to E by the police;