The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be innocent.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant even though the defendant did not participate in the singing operation for raising his/her child during the period of charge, is erroneous in the misconception of facts.

B. The sentence of the lower court (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the facts charged against the Defendant is “A person who operates a singing practice hall with the name of “Esing” on the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and the second floor along with his wife B.

(1) On October 25, 2016, in collusion with B, the Defendant: (a) received 24,000 won from four customers, F, etc.; (b) sold cans to four customers, such as F, etc.; (c) received demand from four male customers, such as F, and received 30,000 won per hour from the said customers; and (d) received 30,000 won per woman’s entertainment loan with three female customers, and arranged for entertainment by having three customers drink alcoholic beverages with music and dance.

B. On November 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) conspired with the co-defendant B of the lower judgment on November 10, 2016, the Defendant received 40,000 won from four customers, G, etc.; (b) sold cans, 27 beer, and 1 bottles, etc.; (c) received demand from four male customers, including G, to urge them to do so; (d) received 30,000 won per hour from the above customers; and (e) received 30,000 won per woman loan from the above customers; and (e) arranged for entertainment by having four female customers drink alcoholic beverages with music and dance.

“” is:

The court below found the above facts charged guilty.

B. (1) In full view of the following circumstances, the direct act of each alcoholic beverage sales and entertainment arrangement as indicated in the facts charged was prosecuted B for a public offering relationship with the Defendant.

Recognized.

(A) On October 25, 2016, the police officer reported that two women presumed to have singing in the instant singing practice room around October 2016, 2016, followed by the facts charged by October 20:27, 2016.