logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.31 2016나52965
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Plaintiffs and Defendant C. in the judgment of the first instance, including Plaintiff A’s claim against Defendant C, which was expanded in the trial of the trial.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. Plaintiff A 1) passive damage (imported Plaintiff A 1) 1. 3. The Plaintiff 2 suffered from 26% of the mental disability in accordance with the Madra 2 Disability Evaluation Table, and Plaintiff A 2’s daily loss from the above permanent disability amounting to 149,531,927 for the period from January 19, 2021 to January 18, 2068. The Plaintiff 1. 3. Medical Treatment Costs of Plaintiff A 20. 1. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 1. 20 of the Seoul University Hospital’s physical diagnosis results and fact inquiry results with Plaintiff A’s physical diagnosis results, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that Plaintiff A permanently lost 26% of the working ability due to the instant abuse.

arrow