1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the liability for damages are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following matters after the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, this part of the liability for damages is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. The Defendant asserts that, on July 16, 2014, the Plaintiff, a member of the instant association, was unable to file a claim for damages on the ground of nonperformance of the contract for the supply of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of the goods for the purchase of

However, even if the Defendant erroneously made a mistake on the size of the place of business of the instant association and the capacity to supply manufactured food, it is merely an error of the motive not specified, and thus, it cannot be revoked the contract for the supply of manufactured food in this case.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The amount of damages of the instant association due to the Defendant’s nonperformance of the contract for the supply of food to the Defendant is expected to be calculated by subtracting the expenses to be received from the price of the instant association where the instant association supplied the Defendant with a cover-in food for one year from August 1, 2014 to July 31, 2015, according to the contract for the supply of a cover-in food.

B. The Plaintiffs asserted that the amount of damages of the instant association due to the Defendant’s failure to perform a contract for the supply of a percentage sheet is KRW 120 million,00,000,000,00 from September 16, 2013 to September 16, 2014 (i.e., a total of KRW 80,000,000 x 15% of the amount paid by the Defendant). As such, the Plaintiffs asserted that the amount of damages of the instant association arising from the Defendant’s failure to perform a contract for the supply of a percentage sheet is KRW 12

However, the above 1. A.

In this subsection, the following circumstances, i.e., the full purport of this facts and arguments, which may be known.